C. Reider Live for the First Time

Wednesday, 11 July 2012

Yup, first live show!
Somehow I managed to get a good recording, even though I didn’t sound check the recording device, I just hit record and off to the races.

Here’s the recording:



Setup was (in order of appearance):
* Induction mic’ed electric fields into Reverb
* Handmade tine instruments (2 of them)
* Aluminum cooling radiator for an old Mac motherboard into reverb
* Bad Vibes synth into Pod V2 into Gristleizer into NanoCompressor
* Audible Disease Infection 3 synth
*AM Radio into noise gate into Audible Disease Convulsion 2 pedal into reverb

Performance was July 5, 2012 at Bizarre Bazaar in Fort Collins, Colorado. I opened for Radere and Andrew Weathers Ensemble.

Thanks to Ryan Emmett for setting it up (and DJing) and to Zehr for live sound.


Buddha Reduction news

Monday, 9 July 2012

A couple of cool things going on with regards to the new C. Reider release “Buddha Reduction“:

The company that makes the Buddha Machine, FM3, chose this new release as their remix of the month. Check out the excerpt here: http://soundcloud.com/buddha-machine/c-reider-buddha-reduction-2

Marc Weidenbaum wrote a brief article about the release for the excellent web journal Disquiet:
http://disquiet.com/2012/07/07/reider-vuzh-buddha-reduction/

And of course, the full album is still available for streaming or free download right here: http://www.vuzhmusic.com/releases/buddha.html


Weekly Twitter Update

Sunday, 8 July 2012

Powered by Twitter Tools


Cracks Appear + Buddha Reduction remixed

Wednesday, 4 July 2012

Two new releases of note:

It is a happy occasion to report that the anonymous collective Digital Mass has taken advantage of the CC license I used when releasing Buddha Reduction, and derived their own work based on my original sounds.

Here’s their reworking of the Buddha Reduction, it’s very ambient-y:
Digital Mass with C. Reider- Prolongued Buddhic Reduction


And in other news, there’s a brand new track by Auzel, and one by C. Reider too, along with several familiar faces (like Kirchenkampf, Hal McGee, Travis Johnson, Mutant Beatniks) on the new compilation from the Implicit Order. Each artist on the comp re-worked sound samples provided by Anthony of I.O. Pretty cool stuff to be found there.

Here’s the link, go download it!

http://theimplicitorder.bandcamp.com/album/cracks-appear




Concert

Tuesday, 3 July 2012

I’ll be playing live for my first live performance on July 5 in Fort Collins, Colorado at a cool little used book / record store called Bizarre Bazaar. I’m playing in support of Boulder-based ambient musician Radere and Andrew Weathers from Oakland, California.

If you’re in the Northern Colorado area, come check it out! Cheer me on! Or jeer and laugh at me if I fail!

Here’s the Facebook link if you use that service:
http://www.facebook.com/events/332907456791769/


Reduction

Tuesday, 3 July 2012

“Reduction” is what I’ve been calling a certain process I use when processing sounds during composition. I’m probably not the only person to do this, I just don’t know of others. It involves a certain kind of noise reduction DSP. The audio editor is my main tool, where I do the vast bulk of work. The specific one I currently use, Amadeus Pro has a noise reduction function to it that can sample a selected sound. It’s usually used for, and was presumably designed to be used for, a hiss or rumble that runs through the entire track, but is isolated in one spot so it can be sampled. After sampling, the algorithm would scan the entire audio file for that sound, and attempt to remove all instances of it while leaving the rest of the audio mostly intact (but it does leave plenty of artifacts, when used as it was intended).

Not long after I first started to use this audio editor a number of years ago, I experimented with what might happen when you use the “desirable” signals instead of the “undesirable” noise as the sample that the noise reducer works on? What might happen if, for example, you sampled the entire audio file, and then removed that noise from itself?

The answer to that question is that, surprisingly, not all of the audio file is removed, there are some artifacts that are left over. For a piece called “Erased Silent Night (after Rauschenberg)” (sorry no sound clip), I had to subject the original recording of “Silent Night” by Simon and Garfunkel to about fifteen or twenty repeated noise reduction passes before I got the result approaching silent. Even so, it is still not completely silent. As Robert Rauschenberg‘s “Erased De Kooning” is not completely blank. (Rauschenberg’s Artsy page: https://artsy.net/artist/robert-rauschenberg).

A more satisfying use of this effect has been when I am working with a set of sounds instead of a single sound. One sound set I have used so far was the first twelve numbered “Constant” drones released on various netlabels and by various artists, the result of that work was my 2008 release “Inconstant“.



Another sound set I’ve used was a selection of five recordings of Thomas Park blowing on bottles, as the provided samples in one of Marc Weidenbaum‘s Disquiet Junto series of creative challenges for sonic practicioners.



The most recent set of sound sources that I selected as the subject for this process were the loops that were included on the FM3 Buddha Machine and Buddha Machine 2.

In each case there is a collection of sounds which have a numerical order, there were chronologically 12 Constant releases at the time I composed “Inconstant”, there were 5 numbered bottle sounds in the provided sound sources for the “Palindrone” Junto, there are nine loops in both the Buddha Machine and the Buddha Machine 2, featured chronologically one can presume that there is a 1st, 2nd, 3rd and so on.

The process I normally use in reduction with a numbered sound set is to begin with an audio file set as the target file, and then take the next audio file in sequence and use that as the first sound sampled and used to remove ‘noise’ from the primary target file. Then I’ll go on in sequence using the next sound file as the sample base for noise reduction, and the next, and so on… eventually using all the sounds in the set in order. What I’m left with in the end is a ‘reduced’ target sound that one might say is elementally different from all other sounds included in the set, given that all other sounds in the set were subtracted from it. Then I’ll move on, making the the next file in the sequence the target sound, and I’ll use the sound that follows it as the first basis for noise reduction, and I’ll continue moving around the sequence in order sampling and removing that noise, on and on and on until complete.

In the case of the most recent release “Buddha Reduction“, I first went through this process for all nine sound files, then I did it again in reverse order, leaving me 18 reduced files for both the first Buddha Machine and the Buddha Machine 2. Simple math tells me that there were 81 forward processing sessions, and 81 backward processing ones for each reduction, so in total for this release there were 324 processing sessions, not including processing for reverb and delay.

“Buddha Reduction 1” uses the sounds reduced from the Buddha Machine. The files processed in forward order were treated with reverb, to make the rather ‘denuded’ sounds more palatable to listen to. The files that were processed in reverse order were treated with a delay. The tempo of the delay was based on the perceived tempo of the original unprocessed sound file. Each file is introduced one by one into the mix according to its number in the set, and as each file is introduced, its tempo becomes the dominant one, affecting the delays of all other audible files in the mix at the time. “Buddha Reduction 2” follow exactly the same process, but uses the nine Buddha Machine 2 loops as its sound set.



This is, as you can imagine, a somewhat tedious process to work with. I actually think that tedium and process music ought to be bedfellows, so this is acceptable to me.

I hope this describes the process well enough. Feel free to ask for clarification if my description was too confusing. Knowing the way I write, I expect that it is likely!


ETA:
Here’s the most recent example: a straight reduction, with no further processing.





Buddha Reduction

Monday, 2 July 2012

The newest release on Vuzh Music, released today, is a piece of process music based upon the sounds in FM3’s Buddha Machine & Buddha Machine 2, the “Buddha Reduction” by C. Reider utilizes a process called reduction, which is a systematized application of a very specific kind of noise reduction.

A longer blog post explaining the process will be published soon, until then, please listen to and/or download the new C. Reider release!



http://www.vuzhmusic.com/releases/buddha.html


Weekly Twitter Update

Sunday, 1 July 2012

Powered by Twitter Tools


Weekly Twitter Update

Sunday, 24 June 2012

Powered by Twitter Tools


Now Playing: Netlabel music

Sunday, 17 June 2012

I’m finally getting some time to get caught up on my netlabel listening. The big project that was taking up so much of my time is now behind me (a sound art exhibition archived here: http://soundthroughbarriers.com) and I can concentrate on my other interests again!

So in preparing this post, I noticed that a lot of the Creative Commons licenses that are used here don’t allow remixing… “no derivative work”. Obviously it’s up to each artist / label to decide what license to use, but I humbly argue for a more open license, such as CC BY or CC BY NC SA — a no-deriv license amounts to a monologue, allowing derivative work opens up the work to dialogue. I’ve been strongly considering the idea of basing a new work on appropriated sounds from the netlabel underground, (with proper attribution, of course) and it’s dismaying seeing all of these good releases that disallow it.

And now I’m getting off my high horse and we can proceed to the reviews.



Clay Gold – Clay Mining
http://threelegsduck.bandcamp.com/album/clay-mining
Three Legs Duck / CC BY SA / Name your price

A percussion improvisation with heaped-on effects, soft-pad washes & tinkles, and some samples too. I am ambivalent about it.



He Can Jog – Pocket Suite
http://pocketfields.com/post/24536164742/pf028-he-can-jog-pocket-suite
Pocket Fields / CC BY NC SA / Free
(Note: Archive.org lists the release as CC BY NC ND, but in conversation with the artist, that’s a mistake, and the above license is correct)

It is a bitcrushed swampland of electronic crickets & frogs, with an Ariel Kalma-esque feeling of something hovering. Comes packaged with the source code.



Miquel Parera Jaques – Empty Space
http://www.tecnonucleo.org/index.php?page=release&release=33
Techno Nucleo / CC BY NC SA / free

Frequency oscillations beat and collide together until they burst. Aw… poor square waves!
Samples and source code also available.



Travis Johnson – Menotact
http://www.controlvalve.net
Control Valve / license not listed / free

A quietly modulating electronic drone supplemented by the occasional electro-bloop, or sine-glissando is paired with an indoor site recording in which not much happens (a rustle of slight movement, something clicks or clatters). Later, there are a few claps in a reverberating space. None of it adds up to much, but that’s all-right with me, I happen to think it’s pretty nifty!



Lezet – Hum
http://www.etchedtraumas.net/discography/hum/
Etched Traumas / license not listed / free

Assembled from incidental mouth / breath noises. Disinterested sounding “ah”s & “hm”s join amphibian snurks, clammy gurgles & bovine grunts as the primary source material for the two pieces that are the focus of this release. The compositional structure is as insistent as aimless, like a room full of morons bumping into one another: perhaps then the point is to dance to it? It’s funny at first, and then a little disturbing, and most definitely worth a listen. I’ll leave it to a literary scholar to tell me whether or not this is sound poetry.



Meteer
http://www.bfwrecordings.com/releases/Meteer/ThreeWordSeminary/
BFW Recordings / CC BY NC ND / free

One day the “outside world” will discover how good Bjorn Asserhead’s Meteer project is, and what’ll happen then? Hopefully the rest of us netlabel folk will beam with pride and send him virtual handshakes and pats on the back, and he’ll make sure to remind people in that edenic “outside” that there’s other people like him making music and giving it away for free… “down there”. Seriously, though this chill rhythmic ambient music is better than much of the similar stuff I’ve heard on the 12k label, and he hits the occasional evocative groove that stands on its own. He’s an artist worth following.



Naïve Mind – ___________ (Put a title in this line if you want)
http://www.zenapolae.com/zen087
Zenapolae / CC BY NC SA / free

If you asked a lot of people if they like competent pop-techno with simplistic, pretty melodies sometimes with a bit of guitar plucking alongside, many of those people would say “yes, I like those things”. I’m not one of them, so this gets chucked in the bin.



David Nemeth – Home Drones
http://archive.org/details/Home_Drones_Nemeth
Treetrunk / CC BY / free

Miscellaneous domestic hums and whirrs treated as though they were worth documenting and listening to, which of course they are. I think it’s fab.



Juan Antonio Nieto – The Voice Inside
http://archive.org/details/TheVoiceInsideem177
Electronic Musik / CC BY NC ND / free

Filmic spooky atmospheres with a distant hint of Robert Rich’s “Trances / Drones”



Protofuse – Bits#10
http://protofuse.bandcamp.com/album/bits-10
self-released / copyrighted / it was free, but I guess now you have to pay?
Low-rent Basic Channel minimal techno stuff. It burbles along unremarkably enough. I’m often partial to this kind of thing, so I like it, but admittedly it’s not the most exciting music in the world.



Radio Royal – RRDL01
http://clinicalarchives.blogspot.com/2012/04/ca495-radio-royal-rrdl01.html
Clinical Archives / CC BY NC ND / free

A few seemingly competing interests here. Several extended freeform electronic jams with background loops and dirty lo-tech synths. Then the loops come to the fore to accompany a boring sampled vocal monologue, and things get more problematic. Then there’s another big change when nestled in the middle of it is a great psychedelic track with a wobbly repeating guitar / drum phrase and the vibrating inflections of a vocalist intoning in Japanese (?). Suddenly it all sounds more interesting.



Restive – [m2012/30-09]
http://archive.org/details/restive_m30
self released / CC BY NC SA / free

That fondly familiar Restive construction: independent loops of rumbling noises, one track has a Cluster-ish little keyboard meditation, I’d love to see more like that!



Slowpitch – Biosphere Stargaze
http://bahdoom.com/bah002/
Bah Doom / copyrighted / free

Hazy sound clumps looping for opiated head-nodding. Each track starts off promising, but never develops into anything but another reason to stare bleary-eyed at the wall.



Chris Whitehead – South Gare
http://linearobsessional.bandcamp.com/album/south-gare
Linear Obsessional / CC BY NC SA / free

A composition that organizes selected phonographic elements and multi-tracks them together with a smattering of humble percussive interactions with actual spaces. Absolutely fantastic.








  • News and info about Vuzh Music artists and friends, written by C. Reider
  • Base

  • Elsewhere

  • Categories

  • Archives